CFTC 重申对马萨诸塞州最高司法法院备案的预测市场的专属管辖权

CFTC 重申对马萨诸塞州预测市场的专属管辖权美国商品期货交易委员会
版本号 9219-26
CFTC 重申对马萨诸塞州最高司法法院备案的预测市场的专属管辖权
2026 年 4 月 24 日
华盛顿——商品期货交易委员会今天向马萨诸塞州最高法院提交了一份法庭之友陈述，确认 CFTC 对美国商品衍生品市场（包括通常被称为预测市场的事件合约市场）拥有专属管辖权。该案情摘要是在马萨诸塞州联邦诉 KalshiEx LLC 案中提交的，编号为 SJC-13906。
马萨诸塞州的这份文件是 CFTC 更广泛努力的一部分，旨在保护其对预测市场的管辖权免受持续不断的国家侵犯。
“尽管多个法院裁定停止这些努力，但一些州继续对 CFTC 监管的交易所采取不断升级的非法执法行动，”主席迈克尔·S·塞利格 (Michael S. Selig) 表示。 “国会已委托 CFTC 拥有监管商品衍生品市场（包括预测市场）的唯一权力。对于任何试图废除联邦法律并夺取这些市场权力的州，我再说一遍：我们将在法庭上见。”
法庭之友简述概述了《商品交易法》的历史和结构，并描述了国会设计的综合计划如何优先于适用于商品期货交易委员会监管市场的州法律。
CFTC 此前曾对亚利桑那州、康涅狄格州、伊利诺伊州和纽约州提起诉讼，获得了针对亚利桑那州 CFTC 监管的预测市场的临时限制令。 CFTC 还提交了一份非当事人意见陈述，并辩称美国第九巡回上诉法院优先考虑州法律。
-CFTC-

CFTC Reaffirms Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Filing | CFTC
Release Number 9219-26
CFTC Reaffirms Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Filing
April 24, 2026
WASHINGTON — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today filed an amicus brief in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court confirming the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction over the U.S. commodity derivatives markets, including event contract markets commonly referred to as prediction markets. The brief was filed in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. KalshiEx LLC, No. SJC-13906.
The filing in Massachusetts comes as a part of the CFTC’s broader effort to protect its jurisdiction over prediction markets from an ongoing campaign of state encroachment.
“Some states continue to pursue ever-escalating, illegal enforcement actions against CFTC-regulated exchanges, despite rulings from multiple courts halting those efforts,” said Chairman Michael S. Selig. “Congress has entrusted the CFTC with the sole authority to regulate commodity derivatives markets, including prediction markets. To any state that seeks to nullify federal law and seize authority over these markets, I say again: we will see you in court.”
The amicus brief outlines the history and structure of the Commodity Exchange Act and describes how the comprehensive scheme designed by Congress preempts state laws as applied to CFTC-regulated markets.
The CFTC has previously filed lawsuits against Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, and New York, securing a temporary restraining order against state regulation of CFTC-regulated prediction markets in Arizona. The CFTC has also filed an amicus brief and argued that state laws are preempted before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
-CFTC-